Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27716 (AP)

YENIGALLA VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/20313/2025 · 2025-08-06

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010393762025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20313/2025 Between: 1. YENIGALLA VENKATA SIVA RAMA KRISHNA, S/O, SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS OCC.BUSINESS, R/O. RESIDING AT HYDERABAD.NATIVE OF BATIURU VILLAGE, SATTENAPALLI MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS , PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. AT AMARAVATI, 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. THE SUPERINTENDING OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING OF POLICE, PALNADU, DISTRICT. 5. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENAPALLI TOWN AND PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE S H O, SATTENAPALLI RURAL P.S., PALNADU, DISTRICT. 7. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE S H O, PATTABIPURAM P.S., GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONNEKANTI MALLIKARJUNA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 6th respondent in failing to act on the complaint of the petitioner dt. 22.07.2025 as illegal arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No.6 to take action on the petitioners complaint dt.22.07.2025 by taking up appropriate investigation.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 07.08.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20313 of 2025 Dt.07.08.2025 Asr