{1} 970-CP-712-2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 712 OF 2016 IN WP/7292/2016 M/s Sheth Engineering Industries Through Its Partner S A Sheth ….Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others …..Respondents ….. Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Shinde, AGP for State ….. WITH CONT. PETITION NO. 713 OF 2016 IN WP/7293/2016 M/s Ashapura Engineering Pvt Ltd Through Its Director .....Petitioner VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others .....Respondents ….. Mr. A.R. Nikam, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A.S. Shinde, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SMT. VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2025 ORDER : 1. Learned advocate for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that nothing survives in the contempt petitions. 2. Contempt petitions are therefore disposed of as infructuous. (SMT. VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2025:BHC-AUG:26342-DB