Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2771 (RAJ)

STATE AND ORS v. BOR AJMER AND ORS

CW/5535/2000 · 2025-03-19

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12590] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5535/2000 1. State of Rajasthan through the Tehsildar, Basedi District Dholpur 2. Tehsildar, Basedi District Dholpur ----Petitioners Versus 1. Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer 2. The Revenue Appellate Authority, Bharatpur 3. Additional Collector, Dholpur 4. Darshan Singh S/o Shri Ramswaroop Resident of Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 5. Babu S/o Chhidda R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 6. Kapoora S/o Shri Hussaini R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 7. Bundu S/o Shri Hussaini R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 8. Munna S/o Shri Hussaini R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 9. Budho W/o Shri Hussaini R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur 10. Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Maharaj Singh R/o Village Baireli Tehsil Basedi District Dholpur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC with Ms. Gunjan Chawla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashi Kant Saini Mr. Deepak Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 19/03/2025 In view of the liberty extended by the Board of Revenue Rajasthan, Ajmer, vide its judgement impugned dated 29.05.1997, to the State Government to examine the issue of change of soil [2025:RJ-JP:12590] (2 of 2) [CW-5535/2000] classification by the Additional Collector in the allotment letter dated 30.10.1976 and to proceed in accordance with law, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this writ petition. He, however, submits that it may also be extended a liberty to act in accordance with law if any of the allottees has not deposited the premium amount till date as observed by the Revenue Appellate Authority in its judgement dated 07.02.1991. The prayer is not opposed by learned counsels for the respondents. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/8