KAILASH CHAND SHARMA SON OF SHRI RAM SWROOP SHARMA v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
WMAP/262/2024 · 2025-05-02
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27701 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27701 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18591] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 262/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition NO. 6554/2013 Kailash Chand Sharma Son Of Shri Ram Swroop Sharma, Aged About 72 Years, Resident Of Village Post Suratpura, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chief Managing Director, Head Office Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Vaishali Nagar Agar, Near Ajmer Pulia, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. Executive Director (Traffic), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Through Chief Managing Director, Head Office Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Deedwana Depot, Deedwana, District Nagaur (Rajasthan)
5. Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund, Regional Office, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Sheoran JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 02/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:18591] (2 of 2) [WMAP-262/2024]
1. Matter comes upon misc. application submitted by the applicant for correction/rectification in the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by this Court while deciding S.B. CWP No. 6554/2013.
2. Counsel for the applicant submits that the date of appointment of the petitioner is 17.03.1980, hence he is entitled to get the amount of gratuity w.e.f. 17.03.1980 till 30.04.2012 but due to typographical error, the date was incorrectly mentioned in the aforesaid order i.e. 31.10.1984 to 30.04.2012. Counsel submits that appropriate order be passed to rectify the aforesaid
order.
3. Counsel for the respondent has no objection.
4. Considering the above, the instant misc. application stands
disposed of by making the correction in the order dated 31.03.2022 and it is ordered that the date mentioned in the aforesaid order as 31.10.1984 till 30.04.2012 be read as 17.03.1980 till 30.04.2012.
5. This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 31.03.2022 passed by this Court.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/65