$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 642/2025 RADHEY KRISHNA TRADERS .....Petitioner Through: None. versus MOHIT BANSAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER R.P. CELL MCD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 23.03.2026 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/non-compliance with the directions contained in the order dated 08.04.2025 in W.P.(C) No. 4388/2025. The same reads as under: “1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This Court on 07.04.2025 had passed the following order: "At the request made on behalf of learned counsel representing the MCD, list on 08.04.2025 to enable him to complete his instructions, especially as to whether the MCD is ready to revisit the impugned decision so far as the blacklisting and forfeiture of the EMD amount is concerned. " 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order dated 07.04.2025, learned counsel representing the MCD, Mr. Tushar Sannu, on instructions, has submitted that the MCD is ready to revisit the impugned decision so far as the blacklisting and forfeiture of the EMD amount is concerned. 4. This petition is thus disposed of in terms of the aforesaid statement made on behalf of the learned counsel for the MCD. We further provide that till a fresh decision under this order is taken by the MCD, the decision which is under challenge herein shall be kept in abeyance so far as it relates to blacklisting of the petitioner and forfeiture of the EMD amount. We also make it clear that it would be open to the petitioner to take up all the pleas and grounds available to This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50 it under law when the entire matter is revisited by the MCD and for the said purpose it shall be permitted to make a representation within a week.” 3. Compliance affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent/MCD wherein it has been stated as under: This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50 4. The Speaking order dated 08.07.2025 which has been passed by the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50 respondent/MCD pursuant to the aforesaid, has also been filed. The same reads as under: This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50 5. In the circumstances, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of. 6. Needless to say, all legal rights and remedies of the petitioner are reserved. SACHIN DATTA, J MARCH 23, 2026/at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 11:33:50