Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27691 (RAJ)

MOHAMMAD UMAR S/O SH. ABDUL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/295/2025 · 2025-08-18

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32058-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 295/2025 Mohammad Umar S/o Sh. Abdul S/o Abdul, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Dhaulet, Pahadi, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. That Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Deeg District Deeg (Raj.) 4. State House Officer, P.s. Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) 5. Irfan S/o Aasin, R/o Village Garh, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Raj.) 6. Jakam S/o Deenu, R/o Village Ladamka, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Raj.) 7. Sahib S/o Bacchu, R/o Village Bijasana, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (Raj.) 8. Nishar S/o Mubeen, R/o Village Bhori, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg (Raj.) 9. Bhuttu @ Farukh S/o Abdul Rahim, R/o Village Daithat, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg (Raj.) 10. Fakru S/o Suleman, R/o Village Chapra, Police Station Pahadi, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Yogendra Singh, C.I. (SHO) P.S. Pahari, Distt. Deeg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 18/08/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:32058-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-295/2025] 1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus is filed seeking directions to produce the detenue-son of the petitioner. 2. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has produced status report dated 17.08.2025 and copy of statements and the application given by the detenue. 3. As per the status report, the detenue is not under illegal detention and on his own free will is staying at Sohna, Haryana. 4. In view of above, no further order is called for. The petition is disposed of as infructuous. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J DANISH USMANI /15