Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2769 (PAT)

Md. Parvez @ Md. Parwez v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./3878/2025 · 2026-02-20

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3878 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Parvez @ Md. Parwez Son of Md Anif Resident of Village and Post - Rampur, PS- Forbesganj, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 20-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Jogbani P.S. Case No. 155 of 2024 registered for offences under Sections 21 and 22 of the NDPS Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, The prosecution case, in brief, is that during the course of patrolling, at about 9:16 AM., the informant, namely N. Ranjit Singh ASI, 56th Battallion, SSB Bathnaha, stopped an e-rickshaw coming from the side of Forbesganj on suspicion. A sack found on the e- rickshaw was searched, in which Eskuf Cough Syrup (Codeine Phosphate & Triprolidine Hydrochloride)—90 bottles, each 100 ml (total 9 liters); Nitravet 10 (10 mg)—2,220 tablets (total 22,200 mg); Nitrazip 10 (10 mg)—1,500 tablets (total 15,000 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3878 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 2/3 mg); and Spasmoproxyvon Plus (Tramadol Hydrochloride)— 2,160 capsules, each containing 50 mg Tramadol Hydrochloride were found. The driver of the e-rickshaw, namely Irshad, disclosed that the alleged articles belonged to Md. Parwez, who had given them to him for delivery at the border. A seizure list was prepared. On the basis of the written report, the present case was registered. 4. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case. 5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. 6. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail, failing which the Superintendent of Police, Araria will take all steps for the arrest of the petitioner. 7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the proceedings. 8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Araira through FAX for its compliance Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3878 of 2025(4) dt.20-02-2026 3/3 forthwith. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T