1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K. AND SRI. X.M. JOSEPH, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 2090/2019 (WC) (Lok Adalat No. 429/2025) BETWEEN The Divisional Manager, Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd., No.5/4, 3rd Floor, S.V. Arcade, Bilakahalli Main Road, Off BG Road, Bilekalli, I.A.M. Post, Bangalore – 560 076. …. Appellant (By Sri. B.C. Shivanne Gowda, Advocate) AND: 1. Jayalakshmamma B.C., W/o Raju L., Hindu, Now aged about 23 years. 2. Shravani R. D/o Raju L., Hindu, Now aged about 04 years. 3. Shushritha R. D/o Raju L., Now aged about 04 years. 4. Lakkappa S/o Late Gangaramaiah, 2 Hindu, Now aged about 56 years. 5. Rangamma W/o Lakkappa, Now aged about 46 years. All are R/at No.53, ‘B’ Street, 10th Cross, Magadi Road, Bangalore – 23. Also permanently R/at No.7, Bhadripalya, Gangenapura, Shivagange, Nelamangala Tq., Bangalore – 562 111. (Petitioner No.2 & 3 are minors, And representing by their mother Jayalakshmamma B.C.) 6. Gangaiah S/o Thirumalaiah, Hindu, Major, R/o Huchaveeriahnapalya, Baragenahalli, Somapura Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bangalore – 562 111. (RC Owner of Canter No.KA-06/C-3383). 7. Lakshmikanthaiah S/o Late Lakshmaiah, Hindu, Major, R/at Kataveeranahalli Post, Mudimadu Kataveeranahalli, Tumkur – 572 125. (Policy Holder of Canter No.KA-06/C-3383). … Respondents (By Sri. Parameshwarappa S., Advocate for R-1 to R-5) MFA FILED U/S 30 (1) OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.12.2018 PASSED IN ECA NO. 3/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE MACT & XV ADDL. JUDGE, MAO HALL UNIT, BENGALURU (SCCH-19), AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS. 8,03,600/- WITH INTEREST AT 12% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS REALIZATION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED. 3 CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant – Insurance Company is present. 2. Learned Counsel for the appellant – Insurance Company has filed a Memo for Withdrawal and seeks the leave of the Lok Adalath to withdraw the above appeal as not pressed. Further, he prays that the amount if any, deposited before this Court may be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. 3. In view of the Memo, the appellant – Insurance Company is permitted to withdraw the above appeal. The said memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the above Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The amount if any, deposited before this Court shall be transferred to the Claims Tribunal. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER Rbv