APHC010391262002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 20417/2002 Between: 1. VIVEKANANDA GURUKULA VIDYALAYAM HIGH SCHOOL, KURNOOL DIST.,, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT, V. VENKAT REDDY, S/O. VENKAT REDDY, MAHANANDI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, R/O. MAHANANDI, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARY HYDERABAD, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH , SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, CUDDAPAH REGION, CUDDAPAH. 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. K KASI REDDY, DWARAKACHARLA, KOMOROLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders, particularly one in the nature of Writ, of Mandamus, declaring the orders of the 1st Respondent in Memo. No. 5819/PS.2/2002, dt. 19-9-2002 and the consequential order of the 2nd Respondents in Rc.No. 2177/D2-1/98, dt. 27-9-2002 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, violative of the principles of natural justice, and contrary to the Education rules, and consequently quash the same, and direct the respondents to continue the aid to the Record Assistant Post in the petitioner school, and grant such other relief as this hon’ble high court may deem fit and proper. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 25591 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders of the 1st Respondent in Memo. No. 5819/PS.2/2002, dt. 19-9-2002, and its consequential order of the 2nd Respondent in Rc. No. 2177/D2-1/98, dated 27-9-2002, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition, and grant such other relief as this honourable high court may deem fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER: On 27.10.2021, 07.07.2025 and 24.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS