Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27685 (PNJ)

SATVIR SINGH ALIAS SATVIR SINGH NAIN v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/9650/2025 · 2025-05-12

Sanjiv Berry

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9650-2025 Date of decision: 12.05.2025 SATVIR SINGH ALIAS SATVIR SINGH NAIN ….PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. D.P.S. Bajwa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amrik Narwal, DAG, Haryana. **** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under: FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 30 01.02.2025 316 (2), 318 (4), 351 (2) of BNS, 2023 Sadar Narwana, District Jind. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance to the order dated 19.03.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such prayed for confirming the interim bail granted vide order dated 19.03.2025. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Rajesh Kumar, intimates the Court that the petitioner has joined investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation. KANIKA 2025.05.15 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-9650-2025 2 4. During the course of hearing on 19.03.2025, following order was passed: “ It is inter alia contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the petition, the matter has been compromised with the complainant and a petition for quashing of the FIR on the basis of said compromise has already been filed vide CRM-M-13091-2025, which is pending for 27.03.2025. He submits that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents and is ready to join the investigation. Learned counsel for the complainant has admitted the factum of compromise being voluntarily effected between the parties and that a petition seeking quashing of FIR on the basis of compromise has already been filed. He submits that the complainant has no objection in case the peititoner is granted the concession of bail. Be it the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the petitioner is hereby directed to join investigation within seven days from today and co-operate in the same. In the event of the arrest of the petitioner, he shall be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. List on 27.03.2025. ” 5. Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 19.03.2025 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 19.03.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by KANIKA 2025.05.15 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-9650-2025 3 way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. 6. The petition stands allowed. 7. It is made clear that anything contained hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 12.05.2025 (SANJIV BERRY) kanika JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.15 11:50 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment