SARV BANDHU v. SARITA CHAUHAN SECY.EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ORS.
CPSW/95/2019 · 2025-09-10
Vinod Chatterji Koul
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2768 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2768 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 44
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 95/2019 in SWP No. 2165/2016
Sarv Bandhu
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. Gagan Kohli, Advocate
V/s
Sarita Chauhan Secy. Education Deptt. and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
10.09.2025
Statement of facts has been filed which reveals that an FIR bearing No. 30/2016 registered at Crime Branch, Jammu, is still pending and though same was challenged by the petitioner but the petition was dismissed. It is being submitted by learned counsel for the respondents that they have complied with the order since there is a case pending, therefore, he cannot be appointed.
In view of the above, the proceedings are closed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be given liberty to file the writ petition for appropriate relief having regard to the compliance filed. Proceedings in this contempt petition are closed with liberty as sought.
(Vinod Chatterji Koul)
Judge
Jammu:
10.09.2025 Shafqat