Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27677 (AP)

SMT UPPILLI SIMHACHALAM v. SMT NUNELA YERUKALAMMA

CRP/2085/2025 · 2025-09-18

R Raghunandan Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010393152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2085/2025 Between: 1. SMT UPPILLI SIMHACHALAM, A W/O. LATE MUSALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 13-246, INDIRA NAGAR, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT NUNELA YERUKALAMMA, A.(DIED). 2. 2. SMT JOGA SANYASAMMA, W/O LATE MUTYALA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. SMT NUNELA RAMANAMMA, .W/O LATE SURIBABU, HINDU, AGED 57 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.3-67, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, CHINAGADILI MANDAL, WARD N0.-66, GVMC, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. NUNELA SRI RAM, S/O LATE SURIBABU, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.3-67, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, CHINAGADILI MANDAL, WARD N0.-66, GVMC, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SMT ATLABOINASIVA KUMARI, .W/O RAMAKRISHNA, D/O LATE NUNELA SURIBABU, HINDU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/AT D.NO.3-67, VENKATAPURAM VILLAGE, CHINAGADILI MANDAL, WARD N0.-66, GVMC, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 RRR,J C.R.P.No.2085 of 2025 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved by the Order dated 05.11.2024 passed in I.A. No. 1144/2023 in O.S. No. 1196/2012, on the file of 1st additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam for the following grounds among other IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of (73 ) days in filing the above C.R.P. filed against the I.A. No. 1144/2023 in O.S. No. 1196/2012, dated 05.11.2024 on the file of 1st additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the order/decree dated 05.11.2024, passed in I.A. No. 1144/2023 in O.S. No. 1196/2012, on the file of the 1st additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam in the above C.R.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 RRR,J C.R.P.No.2085 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is desirous of withdrawing this Civil Revision Petition and for filing of a fresh suit. 2. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date:19.09.2025 KPV 4 RRR,J C.R.P.No.2085 of 2025 543 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITON No:2085 of 2025 19.09.2025 KPV