23.04.2025 DL-31 Ct. No. 33 Srimanta In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side IA No.:CAN/1/2008 (Old No.:CAN/9505/2008), CAN/2/2008 (Old No.:CAN/9745/2008), CAN/3/2009 (Old No.:CAN/6514/2009) in WPA 11019 of 2007 Susanta Kumar Saha -Vs.- Union of India & Ors. Mr. K. B. S. Mahapatra, Mr. Aditya Shit, Ms. Arifa Sultana …for the petitioner. Mr. Ashok Prasad …for the Union of India. The learned Advocate representing the respondent has filed a report in the form of an affidavit whereby it has been stated that the petitioner had retired and had received his dues as per the documents marked as annexure – p/1. The learned Advocate representing the petitioner concedes the same. Under such circumstances, the instant writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)