VEERA SATYAVATHI @ SATTEMMA v. D. SESHAGIRIRAO & 2 ORS.
MACMA/3319/2012 · 2025-02-13
V R K Krupa Sagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2767 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3319/2012
JUDGMENT:
The learned counsel for the respondent No.3/insurance company alone is present. After detailing all the facts on 11.02.2025, directed that the matter be listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is still no representation for the appellant.
2. In these circumstances, this M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ Dr. V R K KRUPA SAGAR, J Dated: 13.02.2025 S D P
2
14 THE HON’BLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3319/2012
Dated: 13.02.2025
S D P