Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27669 (PNJ)

MANGAL RAM v. COMMSSIONER AMBALA DIVN. AND ORS

CWP/4896/2000 · 2025-08-26

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Mangal Ram Commissioner, Ambala Division and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for Mr. K.S.Rawat, Advocate for Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate, for respondent No.11. DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is not responding to his communication Dismissed in August 26, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4896 Date of Decision : Versus Commissioner, Ambala Division and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate for Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. None for respondents No.2 to 10. Mr. K.S.Rawat, Advocate for Mr. G.S.Nagra, Advocate, for respondent No.11. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is not responding to his communications. Dismissed in default. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 2025 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4896-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision : 26.08.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner is DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.08.27 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document