- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3231 RFA No. 1427 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1427 OF 2023 (PAR/INJ) BETWEEN: SRI. B.N.VASUDEVA REDDY AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, SON OF LATE SRI P NARAYANAPPA, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO. 401, 'SAPTAGIRI NILAYA' NEXT TO VAKIL GARDENIA APARTMENT, OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU - 560 103. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUSHANTH.V.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. G.JAYARAMA REDDY (SINCE DECEASED) S/O LATE GURAPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE J.VIJAYKUMAR., AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SON OF G.JAYARAMA REDDY, RESIDENT OF NO.2/1, "MARUTHI NILAYA", DOMLUR HAL MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 071. B.N.JANARDHANA REDDY SINCE DECEASED S/O LATE SRI.P.NARAYANAPPA, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3231 RFA No. 1427 of 2023 BY HIS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES 1. SMT. VANAJAKSHI WIFE OF SRI B.N JANARDHANA REDDY, 2. SRI. SANDEEP B.J SON OF SRI B.N.JANARDHANA REDDY, 3. SMT. DIVYA B.J DAUGHTER OF SRI B.N JANARDHANA REDDY, RESIDENT OF NO.401 'SAPTAGIRI NILAYA', NEXT TO VAKIL GARDENIA APARTMENTS, OUTER RING ROAD, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU-560 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SUHAS.H.S., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Counsel for the appellant has appeared in person and sought time to comply with the office objections. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3231 RFA No. 1427 of 2023 the appeal was listed on 08.01.2025, on that day, finally a week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 24.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 08.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6