Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27663 (RAJ)

SMT. VARSHA YADAV W/O SH. MUKESH YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5690/2020 · 2025-09-11

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36868] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5690/2020 1. Smt. Varsha Yadav W/o Sh. Mukesh Yadav, aged around 41 years, R/o B-702, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Sh. Mukesh Yadav S/o Sh. Ram Dayal Yadav, aged around 43 years, R/o B-702, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Sh. Mukesh Ahuja S/o Sh. Manmohan Ahuja, aged around 50 years, R/o B-704, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 4. Smt. Rajni Ahuja W/o Sh. Mukesh Ahuja, aged around 45 years, R/o B-704, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 5. Sh. Sumit Kumar Ajmera S/o Sh. Gopal Lal Ajmera, aged around 35 years, R/o B-202, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Sh. Rahul Kumar Ajmera S/o Sh. Gopal Lal Ajmera, aged around 33 years, R/o B-202, Guman Eternity, GH-1 and GH-2, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur. ----Accused/Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor. 2. Ankur Khandelwal S/o Shankar Khandelwal, R/o 171, Officers Campus Extension, Sirsi Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Nishita Gambhir, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Javed Khan, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 11/09/2025 1. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. with a prayer for quashing [2025:RJ-JP:36868] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5690/2020] of FIR No.320/2020 registered at Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jaipur City (North) for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 379, 427, 427, 420, 465, 467, 468, 469, 471 and 120-B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State submit the latest factual report dated 27.02.2023 and the same is taken on record. 3. As per the factual report, in pursuance of the investigation in the impugned FIR, a negative final report has already been submitted before concerned trial Court, therefore, this criminal miscellaneous petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 5. Stay application and any other pending applications also stand disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /15