SUNIL KUMAR AND 24 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 11 OTHERS
WTAX/825/2025 · 2025-03-09
Piyush Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27662 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34806
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 825 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar And 24 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Imran Ali,Murtuza Ali Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarify that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse the remedy available under the law.
Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad