CWP-4557-2025 (O&M) 141 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Paramjeet Kaur State of Haryana CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Lupil Gupta Mr. Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for respondent No.2 SUDHIR SINGH Petition herein of Certiorari for quashing impugned possession notices dated 17.06.2024 (Annexure P-3) issued by the respondents. 2. At the outset, learned counsel confines his prayer to the extent that his pending reply not been adverted to by respondent till date, is decided by 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Paramjeet Kaur versus Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Simranjot Singh, Advocate for the petitione Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for respondent No.2 ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of Certiorari for quashing impugned possession notices dated 17.06.2024 3) issued by the respondents. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that confines his prayer to the extent that the petitioner reply/representation dated 04.01.2025 not been adverted to by respondent No.3, i.e., decided by it. 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-4557-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: February 25, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH SUKHVINDER KAUR for the petitioner. Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for respondent No.2-HDFC Bank. issuance of a Writ in the nature Certiorari for quashing impugned possession notices dated 17.06.2024 for the petitioner submits that he the petitioner would be satisfied, in case dated 04.01.2025 (Annexure P-4), which has , i.e., AAVASD Financers Limited, 2 2025 (O&M) February 25, 2025 Petitioner s in the nature Certiorari for quashing impugned possession notices dated 17.06.2024 he would be satisfied, in case has AAVASD Financers Limited, MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.03.03 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-4557-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 3. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of the petition, learned counsel for respondent No.2 – HDFC Bank appears and submits that no relief in the present writ petition has been sought against respondent No.2. 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the pending reply/representation dated 04.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a period of 08 weeks, from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) JUDGE February 25, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.03.03 14:34 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment