Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27655 (RAJ)

BINTU GURJAR S/O SHRI RAMKARAN GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/294/2025 · 2025-08-12

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:31236-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 294/2025 Bintu Gurjar S/o Shri Ramkaran Gurjar, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, District Bundi ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Additional Director Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi 4. Sho, Police Station Dei, District Bundi 5. Mahavir Gurjar S/o Late Kanaram Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 6. Khushiram Gurjar S/o Shri Laxman Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 7. Hansraj Gurjar S/o Kalyan Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 8. Naiwalal Gurjar S/o Shri Forulal, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 9. Ratiram Gurjar S/o Forulal, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 10. Kalyan Gurjar S/o Kishnaram, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 11. Gokul Gurjar S/o Durgalal Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi 12. Devhans Gurjar S/o Shri Kanaram Gurjar, R/o Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Village Ramganj Bansi, Tehsil Nainwa, P.s. Dei, District Bundi ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:31236-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-294/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Takhat Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr.Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr.Aman Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 12/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time realising that inspite of sending an application, no FIR was registered, is not pressing this petition with liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. In the eventuality of petitioner availing the remedies, the forum concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law expeditiously. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/39