[2025:RJ-JP:26181] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14096/2019 Trilok Meena S/o Shri Ram Khiladi Meena, aged about 31 Years, R/o Pilodapura, Tehsil Sapotara, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Board of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Ajmer, through its Secretary. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr.Deepak Bishnoi JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “Is is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: (a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby quash and set aside the impugned action of the respondent by not correcting the Father’s name in the marksheet of Secondary Examination. (b) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby directing the respondent to make the correction in the father’s name of the petitioner as “Ram Khiladi Meena” in place of “Batti Lal Meena”; (c) Any other appropriate order or direction which may be deemed just and proper in the [2025:RJ-JP:26181] (2 of 3) [CW-14096/2019] facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the Board of Secondary Education for correcting his father’s name in the marksheet of Secondary School Examination. 3. As per the contents of the instant writ petition, the correct name of the father of the petitioner is “Ram Khiladi Meena”, but the same has been mentioned as “Batti Lal Meena” in his Class-X marksheet and Certificate as well. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent-Board submits that prior to approaching this Court, no application was submitted by the petitioner in their Office, with any documents in support of his contentions. Counsel submits that certain guidelines have been prescribed for the said purpose, i.e., seeking correction in the father’s name. 5. This Court is not going to enter into the controversy as to whether the desired correction can be made or not, but looking to the fact that the petitioner has not submitted an application for the aforesaid purpose in the Office of the respondents and has approached this Court straight away by way of filing this writ petition. 6. Considering the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application with appropriate documents in support of his contentions before the respondents. In case, the petitioner files an application in this regard within a period of one month from today, it is expected from the respondents to decide the said application [2025:RJ-JP:26181] (3 of 3) [CW-14096/2019] within a period of one month thereafter, by passing a speaking and reasoned order strictly in accordance with law. 7. Since the petitioner has remained unrepresented before this Court, he is not aware about passing of this order, Office is directed to send a copy of this order on the residential address of the petitioner mentioned in the memo of cause-title. 8. All pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /84