Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010268932024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/490/2025 BIPUL KANTI CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE SACHINDRALAL CHOUDHURY, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MARIANI TOWN, P.O.- MARIANI, P.S. MARIANI, DISTRICT- JORHAT, ASSAM, PIN- 783384 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 ASSAM 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 ASSAM PIN- 781019 4:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION GOVT. OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 ASSAM 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 ASSAM 6:THE DISTRICT OF EDUCATION OFFICER JORHAT JORHAT DISTRICT CIRCLE JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 7:THE BLOCK ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER JORHAT BLOCK JORHAT ASSAM PIN Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K PURKAYASTHA, B RONGHANGPI,MR. S SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, MR. S K MEDHI SC, AG (A AND E),GA, ASSAM,SC, EDU,SC, AG (A AND E),SC, FINANCE DEPTT. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 06.03.2026 Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, submits that the projection made in the writ petition of existence of a Government policy, notified on 08.04.1988, permitting further 5 (five) years service to a teacher beyond the age of 60 years, was subsequently found to have occasioned on account of a misunderstanding. Mr. Purkayastha, submits that the petitioner having realized the said aspect has requested him not to press the writ petition any further. Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner, accordingly prays that he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. Prayer is not objected to by Mr. N. J. Khataniar, learned Standing Counsel, Elementary Education Department, Ms. R. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondent no.5 and Ms. K. Phukan, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant