APHC010392632003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23992/2003 Between: 1. N.GANESH, U.D.C.,(RETD.), A.P. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD., TIRUPATHI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN MNG DIRECTOR A P S P D C L TIRUPATHI 3 OTHERS, A.P.S.P.D.C.L.,TIRUPATHI. 2. JOINT MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.S.P.D.C.L.,TIRUPATHI. 3. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.S.P.D.C.L.,TIRUPATHI. 4. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER/ HRD, A.P.S.P.D.C.L.,TIRUPATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, calling for the records relating to Memo No.CMD/CGM/HRD/DS/AS.III/PO(DC)/D.No.934/03 dt. 19-9-2003 passed by the 1st respondent and to quash the same as being arbitrary, illegal, violative of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and also the Instructions issued in Circular Memo No.706/Spl.B3/99-3 dt. 28-10-99 relating to anonymous petitions and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner to the post of Jr.Accounts Officer with effect from 1-2-2001 on which date the petitioner became eligible to hold the said post and sanction increments on the said promoted post and fix the pension of the Petitioner on the notionally drawn increments in the post of Jr.Accounts Officer and release all the pensionary benefits accordingly dehors the said Memo IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 30170 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Memo No.CMD/CGM/HRD/DS/AS.III/ PO9(DC)/ D.No.934/03 dt. 19-9-2003 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the above Writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL 2. Y NAGI REDDY (APTRANSCO) The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR