Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27643 (RAJ)

MAYA @ ACHHA W/O MAHENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10305/2025 · 2025-08-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34307] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10305/2025 1. Maya @ Achha W/o Mahendra, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kailash Nagar, Hindaun City, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli (Rajasthan) 2. Laxmi W/o Madan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhim Nagar, Bayana, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan), Presently Dera Pilupura, Police Station Sadar, Bayana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) 3. Prem W/o Late Dhanna, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Bhim Nagar, Bayana, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan), Presently Dera Pilupura, Police Station Sadar, Bayana, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hari Krishan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Sigh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/08/2025 1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Maya @ Achha W/o Mahendra, Laxmi W/o Madan and Prem W/o Late Dhanna in FIR No. 152/2025 dated 28.07.2025 registered at P.S. Mansalpur District -Karauli, whereby the applicants-accused were charged under Sections 305(A) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:34307] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10305/2025] 2. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicants-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused are required the they will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that all three petitioners are female and they are in custody. He further referred the order of trial court and submitted that one of the accused Santara was released on bail by the trial court at the time of remand as she is having a child with her. He further submitted that remand order dated 29.07.2025 clearly indicated that petitioner Laxmi was having a child of 14 months, who is younger to daughter of Santra. He further submitted that except present case, there is no criminal antecedent against any of the petitioners. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted report along with criminal antecedent received from concerned police station and same are taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:34307] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10305/2025] 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 7. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Supita, police has investigated the matter and arrested 5 persons including present petitioners. One of the accused Santra was granted bail by the trial court on 05.08.2025 indicating that she is mother of 18 months old daughter. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioners. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Maya @ Achha W/o Mahendra, Laxmi W/o Madan and Prem W/o Late Dhanna, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused are ordered to be released on bail with condition that each of the petitioners would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. [2025:RJ-JP:34307] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10305/2025] (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /215