APHC010391652025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19899/2025 Between: M KOLLAPPA, S/O M.NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, R/O CHABALA VILLAGE, VAJRAKARURU MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT ANANTHAPURAMU. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAPTADU POLICE STATION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. PUTTURU LAXMANNA, S/O PUTTURU NAGANNA, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO 14-451 KAMALANAGAR, ANANTAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. 5. PUTTURU VENKASIMHA, S/O PUTTURU LAXMANNA, AGED MAJOR, R/O D.NO 14-451 KAMALANAGAR, ANANTAPUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA GOPINATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in taking action against the unofficial respondents and their henchmen for trespassing into the petitioner's plots and abusing me by naming 2 my caste, pursuant to complaint dt. 11-6-2025 followed by personal visits, as being illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent police to act upon the complaint and take appropriate action against the unofficial respondents in accordance with Law, and to grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, the contents of the complaint submitted by the Petitioner are of civil nature. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Thota Gopinath, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the same the petition may be disposed of. 4. Sri K.Mallikharjuna Murthy, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.4 and 5 is in attendance. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies by filing an appropriate application before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:01.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19899 of 2025 Dt.01.08.2025 Dinesh