Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010251542025 2025:GAU-AS:17595 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1227/2025 AJOY SINGHA S/O MANITAN SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHENGBILL, PS LALA, DISTRICT HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788163 2: SANDHYA RANI DEVI W/O LT. IBONGOTON SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHENGBILL PS LALA DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN - 78816 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LD PP, ASSAM 2:BABY PRIYA SINGHA D/O BABA SANA SINGHA RESIDENT OF KAPTANPUR PART I PS LAKHIPUR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM PIN 78810 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H LASKAR, MR. S ROY Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, In Page No.# 2/3 Case : Crl.Pet./1195/2025 (D/O) AJOY SINGHA AND ANR S/O MANITAN SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHENGBILL PS LALA DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN-788163 2: SANDHYA RANI DEVI W/O LT. IBONGOTON SINGHA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE CHENGBILL PS LALA DISTRICT HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN - 788163 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM 2:BABY PRIYA SINGHA D/O BABA SANA SINGHA RESIDENT OF KAPTANPUR PART I PS LAKHIPUR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788103 ------------ Advocate for : M H LASKAR Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR In Crl.Pet./1195/2025 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 17.12.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Roy, the learned counsel for the Page No.# 3/3 applicant/petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. 2. The learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner has submitted that though the instant interlocutory application was filed by the petitioner for modification of the order dated 22.09.2025, passed in criminal petition No. 1195/2025 by this court, as the petitioner had failed to appear before the trial court in pursuant to the directions of this court due to delay in receipt of the certified copies of the said order, however, in the meanwhile, the trial court has again issued a fresh non- bailable warrant of arrest and the petitioner is intending to challenge that non-bailable warrant of arrest by filing a fresh criminal petition. Hence, he does not want to pursue this instant interlocutory application and therefore, he has prayed for allowing him to withdraw this interlocutory application. 3. The prayer is allowed. 4. The instant interlocutory application is dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant