Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27630 (PNJ)

PREM SINGH ALIAS PREM CHAND v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/10122/2025 · 2025-05-08

Sanjiv Berry

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10122-2025 Date of decision: 08.05.2025 PREM SINGH ALIAS PREM CHAND ….PETITIONER Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...RESPONDENT CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Vikram Rathore, Advocate for Mr. Anshul Mangla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. **** SANJIV BERRY, J. (ORAL) By way of present petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR (Annexure P-1) as under: FIR No. Dated Sections Police Station 356 16.10.2024 109 (1), 115, 190, 191 (2), 191 (3), 329 (3) of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 (1) of the Arms Act. Sector-5 Gurugram, District Gurugram, Haryana. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance to the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioner has already joined the investigation and as such prayed for confirming the interim bail granted vide order dated 03.04.2025. 3. Learned State counsel intimates the Court that the petitioner has joined investigation and is neither required for further investigation nor for any custodial interrogation. 4. During the course of hearing on 03.04.2025, following order was passed: KANIKA 2025.05.13 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-10122-2025 2 “ 3. Heard. 4. It is inter alia contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no concern whatsoever with the allegations levelled in the FIR nor he has been attributed any injury in the case. 5. Learned State counsel on instructions from Investigating Officer of the case present in Court has not disputed the fact that no specific injury is attributed to the petitioner and submits that the petitioner has been asked to join the investigation. 6. Be it the case, without commenting on the merits, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation within seven days from today and in the event of his arrest, he is ordered to be released on interim bail on his furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. He shall also abide by conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023. 7. List on 01.05.2025. 8. Investigating Officer of the case to remain present in Court along with record on that date.” 5. Keeping in view the above submissions made by learned State counsel and the fact that the petitioner had joined the investigation consequent to the order dated 03.04.2025 passed by this Court, interim bail granted vide order dated 03.04.2025 is hereby confirmed, subject to conditions as envisaged under Section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. Further the petitioner is directed to join investigation as and when required in future by way of written notice for such purpose to be served by Investigating Officer of this case upon the petitioner; he will not tamper with the evidence nor will influence the witnesses and will not leave the country without prior KANIKA 2025.05.13 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-10122-2025 3 permission of the Court. 6. The petition stands allowed. 7. It is made clear that anything contained hereinabove shall not be construed to be an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 08.05.2025 (SANJIV BERRY) kanika JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.13 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment