Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27604 (RAJ)

SHRI AMAR CHAND MUKHIYA SON OF NANDLAL MUKHIYA v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

CW/13531/2024 · 2025-01-09

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13531/2024 1. Shri Amar Chand Mukhiya Son Of Nandlal Mukhiya, Since Deceased Represented Through 1/1 To 1/6 1/1 Smt Rukmani Devi Wife Of Shrikrishna, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2 Shri Satya Narain Son Of Amar Chand, (Since Deceased) Through Legal Representatives:- 1/2/1 Smt Leela Wife Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2/2 Manmohan Son Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2/3 Brijlata Daughter Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2/4 Snehlata Daughter Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2/5 Anuradha Daughter Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/2/6 Santosh Daughter Of Late Satya Narain, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer. 1/3 Shri Goverdhan Lal Son Of Amar Chand, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/4 Shri Gopal Lal Son Of Amar Chand, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/5 Shri Brijballabh Son Of Shri Amarchand, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/6 Shri Shrikrishna Parashar Son Of Shri Amarchand, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/7 Shri Mukesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Satya Narain Sharma, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 [2025:RJ-JP:1451] (2 of 3) [CW-13531/2024] Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/8 Shri Rajendra Kumar Son Of Shri Mohanlal Parashar, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. 1/9 Shri Sohanlal Son Of Kalyan Sahai, Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohargar Road, Ajmer And Represented Through Power Of Attorney Holder Mr. Kanhaiya Kala S/o Murlidhar Sharma Age About 65 Years, Resident Of 1, Kshipra Parashar Colony, Opposite Pnb, Foy Sagar Road, Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Land Acquisition Officer, Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer. 2. Smt Shanti Devi Widow Of Shri Ratan Lal, Resident Of Prakash Road, Nagra, Ajmer (Deceased) Through 3. Prakash Banshwal Son Of Shri Ratan Lal, Resident Of Prakash Road, Nagra, Ajmer. 4. Smt Dhapu Devi Widow Of Ramswaroop Kumawat, Through Power Of Attorney Shri Murlidhar Son Of Shri Hanuman Prasad Brahman Resident Of Om Nagar, Lohagal Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.K. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Adhiraj Modi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 09/01/2025 Learned Senior Counsel for the respondent No.2/1 submits that this writ petition, filed against an interlocutory order dated 24.07.2024 deciding an application filed under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, is rendered infructuous inasmuch as the main reference petition itself stands dismissed as withdrawn by the learned Senior [2025:RJ-JP:1451] (3 of 3) [CW-13531/2024] Civil Judge, Ajmer vide its order dated 17.08.2024, a certified copy of which has been submitted for perusal of this Court. He, therefore, prays for dismissal of the writ petition. None for the petitioners. None had appeared on their behalf on last date as well, i.e., 07.11.2024. Taking into consideration the unrebutted averments made by learned Senior Counsel for respondent No.2/1 and the certified copy of the order dated 17.08.2024, this Court is satisfied that this writ petition is rendered infructuous. The same is dismissed accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/159