Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27604 (PNJ)

BALJINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/10621/2024 · 2025-08-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-10621 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Baljinder S State of Pu CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF Present: SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE 1. with murde regular bail in FIR No. registered a 2. certificate o 3. case hinges 4. alias Monti therefore, a 1-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Singh Versus unjab CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF Mr. Aashish Bhagat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vipin Pal Yadav, Addl. A Mr. Ramandeep, Advocate, for the complainant. **** SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE ( Oral ) The petitioner, who is in custo er, has filed this petition unde regular bail in FIR No. 48 dated 12.06.202 at Police Station Kheri Gandian, Learned counsel for the St of the petitioner – accused, whic There is no eye witness in the s on circumstantial evidence. The case of the prosecution i i had illicit relations with wife o a plan was made along with petit -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10621-2024 Date of decision : 27.08.2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU, CHIEF JUSTICE e, Advocate General, Punjab. ( Oral ) ody since 18.07.2023 and is alle er Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of 23 under Sections 302 201, 34 I , Rajpura, District Patiala. tate of Punjab has filed cust ch is taken on record. case and, therefore, the prosecu is that co-accused Gurwinder Si of Balwinder Singh (deceased) tioner to eliminate Balwinder Sin 2024 08.2025 …….Petitioner ….Respondent eged for grant of IPC, tody ution ingh and, ngh. NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.27 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-10621 5. been exam the fact tha inclined to 6. subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/ sureties of Rs. 50,000/ Magistrate and subject to the conditions stipulated in Section 480 (3) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [equivalent to Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.]. , as well as the following conditions : (i) (ii) 7. August 27, 202 narotam Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 1-2024 Be that as it may, since all th mined and remaining witnesses a at petitioner – accused has no grant regular bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/ sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate and subject to the conditions stipulated in Section 480 (3) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [equivalent to Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.]. , as well as the following conditions : (i) the petitioner shall plant 10 saplings of indigenous plants at a public place and submit proof in that regard by way of photographs before the period of 15 days and if there is no such intimation submitted or intimation is found to be incorrect, the State can move an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner; and (ii) the petitioner shall mark his attendance in the court once in fortnight. The petition stands allowed. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- he main prosecution witnesses h are formal witnesses, coupled w criminal antecedents, this Cou grant regular bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two each to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate and subject to the conditions stipulated in Section 480 (3) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [equivalent to Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.]. , as well as the following conditions :- shall plant 10 saplings of indigenous plants at a public place and submit proof in that regard by way of photographs before the trial court within a period of 15 days and if there is no such intimation submitted or intimation is found to be incorrect, then the State can move an application for cancellation of the petitioner shall mark his attendance in the trial ( SHEEL NAGU ) CHIEF JUSTICE Yes/No Yes/No have with rt is grant regular bail to the petitioner, but with stringent conditions. the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail with two each to the satisfaction of the trial court/Duty Magistrate and subject to the conditions stipulated in Section 480 (3) Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [equivalent to Section 437 (3) NAROTAM DASS 2025.08.27 19:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment