APHC010392022006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3495] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT NO: 845/2006 Between: 1. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND, LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUDDAPAH ...APPELLANT AND 1. RAJU PEDDA VENKATA REDDY DIED, W/O.CHENNA REDDY HOUSE WIFE R/O. H.NO. 23/71 NEREDMET, R.R.DT. 2. RAJU SUBBAMMA, W/O LATE PEDDA VENKATA REDDY CULTIVATION R/O PAKEERPALLI H/O CHINNACHOWK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 3. RAJU VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O LATE PEDDA VENKATA REDDY CULTIVATION R/O PAKEERPALLI H/O CHINNACHOWK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 4. RAJU RAJAMMA, D/O LATE PEDDA VENKATA REDDY CULTIVATION R/O PAKEERPALLI H/O CHINNACHOWK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 5. RAJU LAKSHMAMMA, D/O LATE PEDDA VENKATA REDDY CULTIVATION R/O PAKEERPALLI H/O CHINNACHOWK, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Appeal against the Judgment and Decree of the learned SCJ, Cuddapah passed in O.P.NO.8/2001 Dated 24.04.2001 IA NO: 1 OF 2004(CMP 11105 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2004(ASMP 11105 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To Condone Delay of 927 days in representing the Appeal and pass such order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. GP FOR APPEALS 2. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: The Court made the following Judgment: (per NJS,J) The present appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 24.04.2001 in L.A.O.P No.08 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Cuddapah. 2. Heard learned Government Pleader for Appeals, Mr. T S Rayulu and the learned counsel for the respondents/claimants. 3. On 24.04.2001 a batch of LAOPs’ were disposed of by a common order. It would appear that the State represented by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Cuddapah preferred LAAS.No.298 of 2008, aggrieved by the orders passed in O.P.No.12 of 2001, dated 24.04.2001. 3 4. As seen from the case details obtained from the website it would appear that the said appeal LAAS.No.298 of 2008 was dismissed by Hon’ble the Division Bench of the Erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh vide orders dated 27.10.2014. 5. In view of the same, the present appeal is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 06.02.2025 SNI 4 182 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKHARJUNA RAO LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL SUIT No.845 of 2006 February 06, 2025 U SNI