CRM-M-9636-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 302 CRM-M-9636-2025(O&M) Date of Decision: 25.04.2025 VINEET SHARMA ALIAS JONI AND OTHERS ....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Vinod Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate for respondents no.2 to 4. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR No.514 dated 29.09.2021, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 452, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Jind City, District Jind, subsequently charge sheeted under Sections 147, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of IPC and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure P-3). 2. Vakalatnama has been filed on behalf of the respondents no. 2 to 4. The same is taken on record and be tagged at the appropriate place. 3. This Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-9636-2025(O&M) 2 4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jind and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has submitted report dated 17.03.2025 to the effect that the compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 5. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 6. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 7. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.514 dated 29.09.2021, under Sections 147, 149, 323, 452, 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Jind City, District Jind, subsequently charge sheeted under Sections 147, 149, 323, 452 and 506 of IPC and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 02.01.2025 (Annexure P-3) are quashed qua the petitioners. ( MANISHA BATRA ) 25.04.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal 1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable : Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.04.28 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document