Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19148 RFA No. 1173 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1173 OF 2016 (DEC) BETWEEN:
SRIDHARA BABU AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE P.S.RAJU, R/AT C-2, CASAVELLE-4, NO.12/1, LAVELLE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. NARAYANA RAO., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJESHWARA.P.N., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SOUTH INDIA MONUMENTS EXPORTS PVT LTD, A COMPANY REGISTERED, UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT, & HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.110, 4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE, 8TH MAIN, BASAVESHWARA NAGARA, (A.D.HALLI) BANGALORE-79, REP: BY ITS DIRECTOR, SMT. CHANGAMMA.
2.
SMT. PADMAMMA RAJU AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, W/O LATE P.S.RAJU,
3.
MR M. KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE MUNISWAMY, MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT NO.434, 2ND STAGE, 11TH C CROSS, WEST OF CHORD ROAD,
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19148 RFA No. 1173 of 2016
MAHALAKSHMIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 086.
4.
3a.
SMT. P.R. CHANGAMMA SINCE DECEASED
DR. M.GURAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.1 AND 3a ARE R/AT NO.110, 4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE, 8TH MAIN, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, (A.D.HALLI), BANGALORE-79.
5.
SMT. P.R.PREMALATHA W/O H.LAKSHMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, D/O LATE P.S.RAJU.
D/O LATE P.S.RAJU, RESIDING AT NO.111, 4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE, 8TH MAIN, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, (A.D.HALLI), BANGALORE-79.
6.
SMT. P.R.SWARNALATHA W/O H.RAJASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, D/O LATE P.S.RAJU, R/AT NO.111, 4TH BLOCK, 4TH STAGE, 8TH MAIN, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, (A.D.HALLI), BANGALORE-560 079.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RABIYA KHANUM.L., ADVOCATE FOR R1, 3(a), 4 & 5;
SRI. S.NAGESH., ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19148 RFA No. 1173 of 2016
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.Narayana Rao., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajeswara.P.N., for the appellant has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn as the matter is settled out of the Court. When queried, it is submitted that a conscious decision is taken to withdraw the appeal. Submission is noted. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending interlocutory applications stands disposed of.
Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14.1