[2025:RJ-JP:34453] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10523/2025 1. Yogesh S/o Dharmveer, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ghaseda, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Ra- jasthan. (At Present Lodged At Sub Jail Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 2. Sachin S/o Surender, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ghaseda, Police Station Buhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged At Sub Jail Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Kiran Yadav For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. Mr. Brahma Prakash HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.98/2025 registered at Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 119(1), 307, 308(2), 115(2), 331(1), 351(2), 351(3) & 189(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that petitioners are not named in the FIR. Counsel submits that co- [2025:RJ-JP:34453] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10523/2025] accused Sanjay @ Kochiya has already been granted benefit of bail by this Court. Counsel submits that injury on the head of the injured has been opined as simple in nature. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Counsel further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. They submit that petitioners were also involved in the commission of crime along with other co-accused. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that co-accused Sanjay @ Kochiya has been granted benefit of bail by this Court; petitioners are not named in the FIR; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners -(1) Yogesh S/o Dharmveer & (2) Sachin S/o Surender shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- [2025:RJ-JP:34453] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10523/2025] (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /284