- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23217 WP No. 16942 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 16942 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. S RAMAMURTHY S/O V G SUNDRAM NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT 204, 1st MAIN ROAD, 6tH MAIN, B CROSS, VIJAYA BANK COLONY BILEKAHALLI BENGLAURU 560076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TRIVIKRAM S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY ROOM NO. 320 , 3rd FLOOR, VIDHANASOUDHA BENGALURU 560001. 2. DIRECTOR-GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEADQUARTERS NO.2 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU 560001. 3. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD, OPPOSITE COFFEE BOARD BENGALURU 560001. Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23217 WP No. 16942 of 2024 4. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU SOUTH, SOUTH AND CIRCLE, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU 560004. 5. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU SOUTH, SOUTH AND CIRCLE BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU 560004. 6. STATION HOUSE OFFICER JAYANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU 560001. 7. SHIVANNA GOWDA AGED MAJOR, PROPRIETOR OF SK LINKS 4tH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR BENGALURU 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K P YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R6) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-5 TO IMMEDIATELY REFRAIN FROM INTERFERING IN A CIVIL DISPUTE ALLEGED TO BE BETWEEN OF THE PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT NO. 7 AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REFRAIN FROM COERCING THE PETITIONER TO ENTER FOR ANY ILLEGAL SETTLEMENT, AS THEY ARE NOT EMPOWERED TO FIDDLE WITH THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23217 WP No. 16942 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo reading as hereunder: "The counsel for the petitioner most respectfully submits that the prayer sought in the above petition has already been addressed. In view of the same, the petition has rendered infructuous. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above petition as withdrawn." The memo is taken on record. 2. In light of the same, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP