[2025:RJ-JP:25611-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 260/2024 1. Vikram S/o Bhola, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 2. Hardan S/o Shankar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Saradhana Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 3. Jagdish Prasad Gurjar S/o Shimbu Dayal Gurjar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Saradhana Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 4. Surjaram S/o Ladaram Gurjar, Aged About 78 Years, R/o Saradhani Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 5. Kaluram Gurjar S/o Bhambhu Ram Gurjar, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Saradhani Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 6. Rameshwar Gurjar S/o Kanaram, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Saradhani Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 7. Chhotya @ Chhotu S/o Richhpal, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Saradhani Ki Dhani, Surajanpur, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar 8. Raju S/o Moolchand, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bassi Abhyaram, Post Dwarapur, District Alwar ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Anand Kumar, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Shri Avichal Chaturvedi, District Collector, Alwar 3. Manisha Meena, Sub-Divisional Officer, Thanagazi, District Alwar 4. Shri Abhishek Yadav, Tehsildar, Thanagazi, District Alwar 5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Vinod Kumar Tamoliya [2025:RJ-JP:25611-DB] (2 of 2) [CMAP-260/2024] For Respondent(s) : Mr.Neeraj Batra, GC Mr.P.L. Bairwa Ms.Gunjan Chawla Dr.Aartika Shukla, District Collector, Alwar (Through VC) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/07/2025 1. Dr. Aartika Shukla, District Collector, Alwar appearing through Video Conferencing submits that due to inclement weather, she is unable to appear physically. 2. The order dated 09.07.2025 passed on representation of the petitioner, is taken on record. 3. Copy of the order be supplied to learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. In view of the subsequent developments, no case is made out for revival of the contempt petition. 5. The civil misc. application is disposed of. 6. Needless to say, the applicant shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law, if aggrieved of the order dated 09.07.2025 passed on representation of the petitioner. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/50