CHHOTILAL MEENA S/O LATE SEDURAM MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10294/2025 · 2025-08-27
Ashok Kumar Jain
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27564 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27564 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34639] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10294/2025
1. Chhotilal Meena S/o Late Seduram Meena, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Parkhi Talai, Village Kotada, P.s. Daulatpura, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Shankar Lal Meena S/o Late Goduram Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Parkhi Talai, Village Kotada, P.s. Daulatpura, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Fageriya Mr. Jitendra Bhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 27/08/2025
1. Instant application for bail is filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Chhotilal Meena S/o Late Seduram Meena and Shankar Lal Meena S/o Late Goduram Meena in FIR No. 145/2025 dated 29.06.2025 registered at P.S. Daulatpura District -Jaipur West, whereby the applicant-accused was charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2), 3(5), 324(4), 351(2), 303(2), 109(1) of BNS.
2. The applicants was arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application.
[2025:RJ-JP:34639] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10294/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicants-accused are required the applicant-accused will be available. He also submits that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody.
4.
Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that for incident of 28.06.2025, cross FIR No.165/2025 is also registered by petitioner No.1 Chhoti Lal against complainant party and police is investigating the matter. He further submitted that both the parties belong to same family and they are having dispute of land. He further submitted that it is a case of sudden provocation and free fight where the complainant party was aggressor. He further referred injuries sustained by Gopali and submitted that injuries were assigned to Abhishek and Rahul and not any of the petitioners. He also submitted that there is no criminal antecedent against any of the petitioners and one of the petitioners is heart patient. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. He submitted report received from concerned police station along with intimation slip and same are taken on record. None present for complainant. 6. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. [2025:RJ-JP:34639] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10294/2025]
7. On the basis of report, lodged by Chittarmal on 29.06.2025 about incident of 28.06.2025, the matter is investigated and during investigation, injury report of Gopali was prepared. After investigation both the petitioners were arrested and they are in custody. We have considered the statement and also the injury report of Gopali. There is a serious dispute between the parties and cross-FIR is also registered by Chhotilal Meena for same incident. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Chhotilal Meena S/o Late Seduram Meena and Shankar Lal Meena S/o Late Goduram Meena, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2025:RJ-JP:34639] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10294/2025] (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /207