Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010390372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 0 FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19762 OF 2025 Between; Hanumanthu Devendra Prasad, S/o.Hanumanthu Murali, aged 47 years. Residing at D.No.1/166, Sri Vinayaka Nagar, Aravapalli Nandaluru Village and Mandal, Annamayya District. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya, Annamayya District. 3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajampeta, Annamayya District. 4. The Station House Officer, Nandaluru P.S., Nandaluru Annamayya District. 5. Yanamala Sarada, W/o. Hanumanthu Devendra Prasad, Yanamala Venkatanarayana, aged 40 years, residing at Vempalli Village, Opp Awards Tailors, Gandhi Road, YSR Kadapa District D/o. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.
4 herein in interfering the matrimonial dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5th respondent before this Hon'ble court in CMA.No. 641 of 2024 and threatening me to handover the property to the respondents no. 5 and calling me to the police station at the behest of unofficial respondent No. 5 herein and threatening me to vacate the house, otherwise threatening the petitioner to implicate in false criminal as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and violative of Article 14,19,21 and 300 A of cases the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4'*^ respondent not interfere in the matrimonial dispute in any manner, and to grant such other relief or to reliefs as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and circumstances of the case.
proper in the lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 herein not to call the petitioner to the police station or in any manner interfere in the matrimonial dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5*^ respondent before this Hon’ble court in CMA.No. 641 of 2024 including the personal life and liberty of the petitioners, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. JANAKIRAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5:— The Court made the following order:
r- APHC010390372025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) BPS 0^5 [3396] FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19762/2025 Between:
HANUMANTHU DEVENDRA PRASAD, S/O.HANUMANTHU MURALI, AGED 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 1/166, SRI VINAYAKA NAGAR, ARAVAPALLI NANDALURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3.THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RAJAMPETA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NANDALURU P.S., NANDALURU ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5.YANAMALA SARADA, W/0. HANUMANTHU DEVENDRA PRASAD, D/O. YANAMALA VENKATANARAYANA, AGED 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT VEMPALLI VILLAGE, OPP AWARDS TAILORS, GANDHI ROAD, YSR KADAPADISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.J JANAK1RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
2 CMA.No 641 of 2024 and thre^Pif • Hon'ble court in ».s-zEj:^riSrS* srirzsrs“"ss “ s unconstitutional and violative of Article i419°if ^Tono°'^ Constitution oflndia respondttnoVInZerl In mTcasJJ^" SSH£HS--== ^/?e
2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home , on based on the complaint lodged by the Petitioner for preliminary enquiry written instructions, would submit that, Respondent No.5, the Police called family counseling and 3- Sri J.Janaki Ramireddy, learned that recording the same, the petition and crime has been registered against the Petitioner. no counsel for the Petitioner would submit may be disposed of. the Writ Petition is disposed of. matrimonial disputes
5. There shall be no order as to
4. Considering the submissions made. However, Police are directed not to interfere with the between the Petitioner and Respondent No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Superintendent of Police, Annamayya, Annamayya District. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Rajampeta, Annamayya District.
2.
3.
\
4. The Station House Officer, Nandaluru P.S., Nandaluru Annamayya District.
5. One CO to Sri J. Janakirami Reddy, Advocate {OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh {OUT]
7. Two CD Copies. ssb
'-9 HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025
ORDER WP No. 19762 OF 2025 ANOS^ 5 I 3 AUG 20?5 m «o ^ Curre.. 'f/ <J' i:' t: ' c DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS