Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27560 (KAR)

MR. BHAIREGOWDA M.K. v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/861/2024 · 2025-01-22

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2593 CRL.RP No. 861 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 861 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. MR. BHAIREGOWDA M.K. SON OF LATE KENCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT MATTAVARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MUGTHIHALLI POST CHIKMAGALUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU KARNATAKA-577 101. 2. MR. CHANDREGOWDA M.K. SON OF LATE KENCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS RESIDING AT MATTAVARA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MUGTHIHALLI POST CHIKMAGALUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU KARNATAKA-577 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAJANNA B.C., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY CHICKMAGALUR RURAL POLICE STATION CHIKKAMAGALURU-577102 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.NAGESWARAPPA, HCGP) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2593 CRL.RP No. 861 of 2024 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO DISCHARGE THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 341, 302, 201, 109 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC IN S.C.NO.19/2022 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT CHIKKAMAGALURU IN THE ABOVE CASE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners is absent. 2. On the previous date of occasion on 07.01.2025 also, the counsel was absent on 07.01.2025. However, this Court made an observation that in the ends of justice, another two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections and also made it clear that, if the counsel fails to comply with the office objections, list the matter for dismissal on 22.01.2025. Today also, the counsel for the petitioners is absent and not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35