Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010018202025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/142/2025 HUSSAIN AHMED LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM. 2: SAYED AHMED @ SAYED AHMED LASKAR @ SAHID AHEMAD LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3: JAHIR AHMED LASKAR S/O. SOFIQUR RAHMAN LASKAR @ SAFIQUR MIYA R/O. SONAPUR PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP METRO ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE PP ASSAM 2:MD RUHUL AMIN S/O. LT. ABDUL GAFUR R/O. KACHUTOLI PATHAR P/S. SONAPUR DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 PIN-782402. ------------ Advocate for : MR. N MAHAJAN Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER 02.04.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. D Bora, learned counsel for the applicants/appellants. Also heard Ms. A Begum, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam for the respondent. This is an application under Section 430 BNSS, 2023, for suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/ appellants by the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No. 3, Kamrup (M), Guwahati in Sessions Case No. 300/2016 vide judgment and order dated 26.12.2024, convicting them under Sections 302/34 IPC. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties and as can be seen from the impugned judgment and order, there are injured eye witnesses to the crime in question. The evidence of PW-2 and PW-3 is to the effect that they were hit by the applicants/appellants, due to which they had become unconscious. Further, their brother, Jakir Hussain had died at GMCH in view of the assault made on him by the applicants/appellants. On considering the above facts, we do not find that a case for grant of bail Page No.# 3/3 and/or suspension of the sentence imposed upon the applicants/appellants is made out. As such, we do not find it proper to allow the present application for suspension of the sentence and grant the applicants/appellants bail at this stage. Accordingly, the present interlocutory application, stands rejected. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant