Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27554 (JHR)

VIKASH THAKUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/950/2024 · 2025-04-30

Rajesh Shankar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:12948 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 950 of 2024 Vikash Thakur aged about 52 year son of Manmohan Thakur resident of village & P.O.-Kendua, P.S.-Saraiyahat, Dist.-Dumka, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Shashi Prakash Singh, s/o not known to the petitioner, The Director, Primary Education, Department of School Education and Literacy, Govt. of Jharkhand, MDI Building, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. Sri Vishal Sagar, s/o not known to the petitioners, the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 4. Sri Binod Kumar, s/o not known to the petitioners, the District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar, the District Superintendent of Education, Middle School, Old Meena Bazar Campus, P.O., P.S. & Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand … … Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Mohan Dubey, AC to AG Ms. Priyanka Kumari, AC to AG ----- 08/30.04.2025 The present contempt petition has been filed for initiation of contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties alleging wilful violation of order dated 17.10.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1088 of 2022. 2. It is jointly submitted by learned counsel for the parties that the order dated 17.10.2023 passed in W.P.(S) No. 1088 of 2022 has been complied. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the parties, there is no need to further proceed in the present contempt petition. 4. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is 2 hereby dropped. 5. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of. 6. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/-