2025:HHC:14195 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Exe. Pet. No. 328 of 2025 Decided on: 16.05.2025 Rajan Sharma … Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashisht, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned Counsel for the respondents informs the Court that the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed and payment of DCRG and leave encashment stands released in favour of the petitioner. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that no interest has been paid thereupon. 3. In light of the direction passed in the writ petition, this Court is of the considered view that the issue of non-payment of interest cannot be gone into by the Court in the execution petition and in case, the petitioner is aggrieved, he may approach the Court by way of a fresh writ petition. 4. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed but with 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:14195 liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition if, according to him, still his entire dues have not been paid to him including the interest. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 16, 2025 (narender)