Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27543 (GAU)

RAJDEEP DUTTA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2469/2025 · 2025-11-03

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010229222025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2469/2025 RAJDEEP DUTTA SON OF LATE DULAL DUTTA, R/O- 27, AMIYA NAGAR, KARBI CLUB, DHOPULIA, SAWKUCHI, P.S. DISPUR,, GUWAHATI- 781040, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S P CHOUDHURY, MS B DEVI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, W AHMED(FOR INFORMANT),S.M. HASSAN(FOR INFORMANT),MR. R BORA(FOR INFORMANT),MR B CHOUDHURY(FOR INFORMANT) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 04.11.2025 Heard Mr. S.P. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur,, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. Mr. B. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for the informant. Page No.# 2/2 2. The application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Rajdeep Dutta who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dispur P. S. Case No. 0654/2025 under Sections 316(2)/318(4)/336(3) of BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he was working as Deputy Manager, Finance & Accounts in the informant’s company and by misusing his position he transferred an amount of Rs.49,00,856/- to his family members and friends. It appears from Annexure-3 annexed to the petition that the petitioner has also confessed to the aforesaid acts and admitted to having transferred the said amount to his family members and friends, although under the wrong impression that the money was meant for needy persons, which explanation is hardly acceptable. 4. Given the clear implication of the petitioner in transferring such a huge amount of money, the present case cannot be considered to be a fit case for grant of pre-arrest bail. Accordingly the pre-arrest bail stands rejected. 5. Petition stands dismissed. 6. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant