HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 316/2025 Satya Prakash Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Sorsan Ki Jhopadia P.s. Anta Dist. Baran. (Presently Confined T Dist. Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 598/2025 Dinesh Meena S/o Ramprasad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Sorsan Ki Jhopadiya, Police Station Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan. (Now He Is Confined In District Jail Baran, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 599/2025 Vishal Meena S/o Dilip Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Sorsan Ki Jhopadiya, Police Station Anta, District Baran, Rajasthan. (Now He Is Confined In District Jail Baran, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Jain & Ms. Sudha Gupta (in Crl.MB No.316/2025) Mr. Laxman Meena (In Crl.MB Nos.598/2025 & 599/2025) For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Rakesh Kumar for Complainant Mr. Shyoji Lal Meena, C.I. Anta, District Baran (2 of 3) [CRLMB-316/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/01/2025 1. Instant bail applications have been filed by petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.416/2023 registered at Police Station Anta, District Baran for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 336 and 504 IPC and Sections 3/25 & 25(1b)(i) of the Arms Act. 2. It has been submitted by counsel for petitioners that it is case of lodging cross FIRs by both parties against each other and from the side of petitioners, one Rameshwar too suffered injuries. The allegation in the FIR to open firearm is against Dilip Meena & Vishal Meena (petitioner herein in SB Crl.MB No.599/2025), co- accused Dilip Meena has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 28.11.2024 in SB Criminal Misc. Third Bail Application No.13587/2024 and in respect of Vishal Meena, two other injured persons namely Rohitash & Mukesh have denied his presence at the spot. It has been submitted that bullet injuries are not on the vital part of the body and injured persons have been discharged from the Hospital. There are no criminal antecedents of petitioners in respect of similar nature of offence. Petitioners- Satya Prakash & Dinesh Meena are in custody since 29.12.2024 and petitioner- Vishal Meena is in custody since 03.01.2025 and conclusion of trial may take its considerable time, therefore, petitioners be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as also counsel appearing for complainant has opposed the bail applications. (3 of 3) [CRLMB-316/2025] 4. Heard counsel for petitioners, counsel for complainant and learned Public Prosecutor as also perused the record. 5. Having considered the contentions of counsel for petitioners recorded hereinabove as also the entire facts and circumstances of present case and considering the fact that the co-accused- Dilip Meena and other co-accused have already been released on bail, allegation against the petitioner are omnibus in nature; cross FIRs have been lodged by both parties, and conclusion of trial may take its considerable time, but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, all three bail applications are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners (i) Satya Prakash Son Of Shri Ramesh Chand, (ii) Dinesh Meena S/o Ramprasad and (iii). Vishal Meena S/o Dilip Meena shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/7-9