1 APHC010390632025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19789/2025 Between: 1. SHAIK SAIDA VALI, , S/O. SAIDU MASTAN, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. MADINAPADU VILLAGE DHACHEPALLI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, DACHEPALLI MANDAL, PALANADU DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAJALA SUB- DIVISION, PALANADU DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALANADU DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, , DACHEPALLI MANDAL PALANADU DISTRICT. 6. THE MANDAL REVENUE INSPECTOR, DACHEPALLI MANDAL,PALANADU DISTRICT. 7. KOLA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. NAGABHUSHANAM R/O. DOOR NO.2-62, RAYAPUDI VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 8. KOLA NAGAMANJANEYULU, S/O. NAGABHUSHANAM, R/O. DOOR NO.2-62, RAYAPUDI VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. PULIBANDLA KRISHNA MURTHY, , S/O. SURYANARAYANA, R/O. DOOR NO.4-91, PALEM, RAYAPUDI VILLAGE, THULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 to 6 not to calling the petitioner to the police station even without there being any crime and in coercing the petitioner to vacate his lawful possession of the agricultural property extent of Ac.5.79 cents in D.Nos.680/1, 671/7-1, and 671/7-1A of Gamalapadu Village and Panchayat, Dachepalli Mandal, Palanadu District threatening to cause physical harm, and interfering in a civil dispute as illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional, and abuse of power and consequently direct the respondent no. 2 to 6 not to interfere in civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police station at Dachepalli and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.2 to 6 not to interefere in the petitioner civil disputes and consequently direct the Respondent no.2 to 6 not to call the petitioner to the police station at Dachepalli and pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KANADHI BHATLA SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19789/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the action of the Respondent No. 2 to 6 not to calling the petitioner to the police station even without there being any crime and in coercing the petitioner to vacate his lawful possession of the agricultural property extent of Ac.5.79 cents in D.Nos.680/1, 671/7-1, and 671/7-1A of Gamalapadu Village and Panchayat, Dachepalli Mandal, Palanadu District threatening to cause physical harm, and interfering in a civil dispute as illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional, and abuse of power and consequently direct the respondent no. 2 to 6 not to interfere in civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police station at Dachepalli and to pass such…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that a preliminary enquiry was conducted on the complaint made by the unofficial respondents. The petitioner was called to the police station for preliminary enquiry only and no crime has been registered against the petitioner. Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police as no crime has been registered against him. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.08.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19789 of 2025 Dated.05.08.2025 UPS 160