Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:1366
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 14721 of 2024 Date of Decision: 07.01.2025 _______________________________________________________ Manjula Chandel
…….Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents ______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr.
Surya Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejasvi Dogra, Advocate, for respondent Nos. 4 to 7. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
Though, this Court is fully convinced that present petition is not maintainable, but having taken note of the fact that dispute otherwise sought to be raised in the instant proceedings, is already pending adjudication before Sub Divisional Magistrate(c), Jhandutta, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, this Court deems it fit to dispose of the present petition with a direction to afore authority to conclude the proceedings expeditiously. Ordered accordingly. Needless to
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2025:HHC:1366 say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of instant
order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as other stake holders and pass speaking order thereupon. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge January 07, 2025 (shankar)