Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27529 (ALL)

SHEKHAR PAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WTAX/853/2025 · 2025-03-09

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34776 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 853 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shekhar Pal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshul Kumar Singhal,Sumit Daga Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarify that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse the remedy available under the law. Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad