Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010391232023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2703/2023 Between:
1. SMT.SHANTAMMA, W/O K.S. MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 56YRS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O H.NO.48, WARD NO.17 BELLARY, KARNATAKA
2. C. VEERENDRA KUMAR, S/O K.S. MALLIKARJUNA AGED ABOUT 36YRS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O H.NO.48, WARD NO.17 BELLARY, KARNATAKA
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. CHIPPAGIRI VIRUPAKSHMI, S/OVEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 46YRS, R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL
2. VEERA SETTAPPA, S/O NELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 65YRS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL (DIED BY LEGAL HEIRS)
3. KOLI SULUVAI MALLIKARJUNAPPA, S/O VEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 36YRS,
SULUVAI, RESIDING BEHIND MANJUNATHA RICE MILL SIRUGUPPA, BELLARY DISTRICT KARNATAKA (DIED BY LEGAL HEIRS)
4. MALLAMMA, W/O MARE GOUD AGED ABOUT 50YRS, SENICURE R/O MOKA BASARAKODU VILLAGE MOKA MANDAL, BELLARY DISTRICT
5. SOUKARI BASAMMA, W/O GANESH AGED ABOUT 38YRS, SENICURE R/O TONDAHAL VILLAGE VIA RARAVI SIRUGUPPA
2 VS,J W.P.No.2703 of 2023
TQ, BELLARY DISTRICT
6. SMT SIVAMMA, D/O VEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 38YRS, R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL
7. KUM SAVITHRI, D/O VEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 32YRS, R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL
8. RAMESH, S/O VEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 28YRS R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL
9. SMT GOWRAMMA, W/O LATE VEERA SETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 65YRS, RYOT R/O SULUVAI VILLAGE, HOLAGUNDA MANDAL
10. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to Aggrieved by the orders in I.A.No.359/2023 in O.S.No.130/2007, dt.28-06-2023 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Alur the present CRP is filed on the following among other. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. KAGITA MOKSHITHA RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. B SURYANARAYANA The Court made the following:
3 VS,J W.P.No.2703 of 2023
ORDER:
The petitioners herein filed I.A.No.359 of 2023 in O.S.No.130 of 2007 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Alur, seeking condonation of delay of 2532 days in filing an application to set aside the abatement order dated 19.03.2016 passed against defendant No.2. The Court below, vide docket order dated 28.06.2023, dismissed the said application. Challenging the said docket order, the present Civil Revision Petition is filed. 2.
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel representing the respondent/plaintiff stated that, pending the present civil revision petition, final decree proceedings have already been passed by the Court below on 20.10.2023 and also furnished a copy of the decree to prove the same. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause survives in this petition. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date:11.09.2025 KGR