- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6278 CRP No. 322 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 322 OF 2020 BETWEEN: SMT. VASANTHI RAMANAND W/O SRI URVAL N RAMANAND, AGED 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.13, R.B.I. COLONY, 2ND MAIN, ANANDANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 024. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESWARA P N., & SRI. H.R. NARAYANA RAO., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SRI. GOVINDE GOWDA S/O LATE BANDEPPA GOWDA AGED 78 YEARS, 2. SRI.B.VENKATARAMAIAH S/O LATE BANDEPPA GOWDA AGED 81 YEARS, 3. SRI.N.JAYARAME GOWDA S/O LATE NANJUNDE GOWDA AGED 60 YEARS, 4. SMT.N.GIRIJAMMA D/O LATE BANDEPPA GOWDA AGED 58 YEARS, 5. SRI.N.VENKATESH S/O LATE N.NANJUNDE GOWDA AGED 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6278 CRP No. 322 of 2020 6. SRI.NARAYANA GOWDA S/O B.GOVINDE GOWDA AGED 53 YEARS, 7. SRI.LOKESH S/O B.GOVINDE GOWDA, AGED 50 YEARS, 8. SRI.JAGADEESH S/O B.GOVINDE GOWDA AGED 48 YEARS, 9. SRI.KESHAVA S/O B.GOVINDE GOWDA AGED 46 YEARS, 10. SRI.M.R.ASHWATHAPPA S/O LATE RAMAIAH RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 10 ARE R/AT TINDLU VILLAGE, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU. 11. SRI.MADAN GOWDA N S/O NARAYAN GOWDA AGED 26 YEARS, R/AT NO.15, 5TH CROSS, 8TH MAIN ROAD, SAPTAGIRI LAYOUT, VIDYARANYAPURA, BENGALURU-560097. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.MOHAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R11 V/O/D 07.12.2020, NOTICE TO R1 TO R10 IS D/W) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2020 PASSED ON IA NO.2 IN OS NO.25466/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXII ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MAYO HALL BENGALURU (CCH-73) REJECTING THE IA NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(a), (b),(c) AND (d) R/W. SEC.151 OF CPC. FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6278 CRP No. 322 of 2020 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.25466/2020 was dismissed on 28.06.2022. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL