- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC:36779 WP No. 13424 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 13424 OF 2020 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: K R DHRUVAKUMARA S/O RADHAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS KALLUR NAGANAHALLI YELWALA HOBLI MYSORE TALUK AND MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RADHAKRISHNA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. GENERAL MANAGER SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY HUBLI-580 031. 2. CHIEF WORKS MANAGER CENTRAL WORKSHOP SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MYSORE -570 008. 3. WORKS MANAGER CENTRAL WORKSHOP SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MYSORE - 570 008. 4. DY CHIEF WORKS MANAGER CENTRAL WORKSHOP SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MYSORE - 570 008. 5. CHIEF SAFETY OFFICER CENTRAL WORKSHOP SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY MYSORE - 570 008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, CGC) Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:36779 WP No. 13424 of 2020 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER IMPUGNED TERMINATING THE PETITIONERS AGREEMENT OF WORKS NO.08/CWS/MYSS/2017-18 DATED:09.11.2017 AT ANNEXURE-T BY AN IMPUGNED ORDER TERMINATING NOTICE DATED 11.12.2017 AT ANNEXURE-Z-14 AND BLACKLISTING THE PETITIONER FROM, TAKING UP ANY RAILWAY CONTRACTS IN FUTURE ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT THE DEPUTY CHIEF WORKS MANAGER, CENTRAL WORKSHOP, SWR MYSURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER On 14.08.2024 this Court adjourned the matter noting the following order: ''This matter is listed today upon the specific request of the learned counsel for petitioner as he is from outstation and that he would come personally to Court and address the arguments. However, learned counsel for the petitioner absent even when the matter is called on three occasions. Finally, list this matter on 09.09.2024 making it clear if arguments are not addressed on the next date of hearing appropriate orders would be passed including dismissal of the petition.'' None appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the case was called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. Thus, it is clear that the petitioner is not intending to prosecute this matter. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC:36779 WP No. 13424 of 2020 Learned counsel for the respondents is present. Petition is dismissed for non prosecution with the cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to the 'Karnataka High Court Legal Services Committee '. SD/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21