Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27522 (AP)

Ch. Satyanarayana v. Ch. Adinarayana

AS/3643/2003 · 2025-01-22

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010391402003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA FIRST APPEAL NO: 3643 of 2003 Between: Ch. Satyanarayana Ch Adinarayana and Others Counsel for the Appellant: 1. M S R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Y S SAI VARA PRASAD 2. K V SESHAGIRI RAO The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO FIRST APPEAL NO: 3643 of 2003 ...APPELLANT AND Ch Adinarayana and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant: M S R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): Y S SAI VARA PRASAD K V SESHAGIRI RAO made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3397] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA ...APPELLANT ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 3643 of 2003 JUDGMENT: When the matter has been listed today under the Caption ‘For Dismissal’, none appeared for the appellant(s). 3. Learned counsel for the respondent(s) appeared through virtual mode. 4. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal. 5. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date. 22.01.2025 Pnr 7 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 3643 OF 2003 Dt. 22.01.2025 Pnr